12-12-2014, 10:55 AM
I know for a fact that many of these "confiscations" lead to no arrest or convictions. So the question is this.
Why use tax payer money to finance an operation that not only ignores much of what they see but also fails to prosecute those from whom they confiscate from? What's the damn point?
I don't know what most people think about that type of activity but to me it beyond stinks of some rouge law enforcement group that's defrauding the tax payers and engaging in coercion and extortion/racketeering. What the hell else makes any sense considering how it's executed? It's the only thing makes sense and also fits a psychological profile of an individual who has no regard for citizens privacy or state of mental peace. They have no intention of protecting public, if they did, they wouldn't up there engaging in useless activity that only delivers shock and awe.
Why use tax payer money to finance an operation that not only ignores much of what they see but also fails to prosecute those from whom they confiscate from? What's the damn point?
I don't know what most people think about that type of activity but to me it beyond stinks of some rouge law enforcement group that's defrauding the tax payers and engaging in coercion and extortion/racketeering. What the hell else makes any sense considering how it's executed? It's the only thing makes sense and also fits a psychological profile of an individual who has no regard for citizens privacy or state of mental peace. They have no intention of protecting public, if they did, they wouldn't up there engaging in useless activity that only delivers shock and awe.