01-09-2015, 07:51 AM
I see that the good folks at ponohpp.com have posted the responses to the lawsuit against us from the attorney for the BOD. I also noticed that on page 4 of the Amended Answers and #25 something very interesting.
It looks like the BOD had to try to remedy their illegal firing... "Defendants assert board of director ratification as affirmative defense.".
I wonder if that will reduce the Associations liability for the 5 BOD members illegal revenge against the employees? Because it won't on all the other counts against the named defendants.
Maybe you FOBS (Friends of the BOD) can explain to us what that means? Maybe you can find the answer on the HPP web site posted under "BOD Secret Meeting Minutes"? Maybe the BOD will discuss it at the next BOD meeting the way they have kept us informed all along?
It looks like the BOD had to try to remedy their illegal firing... "Defendants assert board of director ratification as affirmative defense.".
I wonder if that will reduce the Associations liability for the 5 BOD members illegal revenge against the employees? Because it won't on all the other counts against the named defendants.
Maybe you FOBS (Friends of the BOD) can explain to us what that means? Maybe you can find the answer on the HPP web site posted under "BOD Secret Meeting Minutes"? Maybe the BOD will discuss it at the next BOD meeting the way they have kept us informed all along?