02-02-2015, 11:44 PM
Another pahoated post, another logical fallacy demonstrated. Today's example is "Special Pleading", often linked with "Shifting Sands" or perhaps more timely, "Moving the Goalposts", where a shift in wording or special exceptions are invoked to try to keep your argument valid.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/special-pleading
"the government entities work for each other" becomes "these agencies work with each other" (No, really?)
"DLNR - ALL LEGAL REGULATION." becomes "Each one has requirements." BUT PGV "got all their permits long ago" (Yes, that's the basis of why PGV believes they are exempt from the nighttime drilling ban. Except their permits say otherwise.)
"Act 97 is buried and dead" becomes ??? (no doubt there is work underway to amend Act 97 and restore some County Rule on geothermal)
As for Ilagan, at least he is working to clarify this situation which is far more than your contributions on this topic. (Yes PM2, that is an ad hominem of the needling variety, and well deserved IMO. Sorry to keep feeding, but hoping to make it educational at least
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/special-pleading
"the government entities work for each other" becomes "these agencies work with each other" (No, really?)
"DLNR - ALL LEGAL REGULATION." becomes "Each one has requirements." BUT PGV "got all their permits long ago" (Yes, that's the basis of why PGV believes they are exempt from the nighttime drilling ban. Except their permits say otherwise.)
"Act 97 is buried and dead" becomes ??? (no doubt there is work underway to amend Act 97 and restore some County Rule on geothermal)
As for Ilagan, at least he is working to clarify this situation which is far more than your contributions on this topic. (Yes PM2, that is an ad hominem of the needling variety, and well deserved IMO. Sorry to keep feeding, but hoping to make it educational at least