02-27-2015, 08:36 AM
It's the microbiological factor that is the issue. Some GMO in the lab not released can kill you outright if eaten. Of all the mutagens created from one imprinting process, less than 1% make the cut for replication and so on through target testing to the final product. These products are not tested with regard to their impact on the microbiological level. No-one knows what effects they have on bacteria and virus nor the ameba floating about in pond scum or all the other countless microorganisms, nor do they know how these products effect cellular development which leads to brain development and every other organ in the body. To assume a product developed in a lab that has less than a 1% survival to market rate is somehow going to offer good things to cellular development in the biosphere and its full host of life forms is critically flawed.
A test for immediate harm is all fine and dandy but it in no way shape or form proves safety.
When it boils right down to it... a mandatory label is only the beginning in a long line of critical safety criteria that should have been established from day one. No-one here or within the scientific community can guarantee anyone that these products aren't at minimum a partial cause in many of the newly emerging health and medical issues plaguing society today.
A test for immediate harm is all fine and dandy but it in no way shape or form proves safety.
When it boils right down to it... a mandatory label is only the beginning in a long line of critical safety criteria that should have been established from day one. No-one here or within the scientific community can guarantee anyone that these products aren't at minimum a partial cause in many of the newly emerging health and medical issues plaguing society today.