Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
technology is "hard"
#8
This was a county council action

Per article:

County Clerk Stewart Maeda hired in-house staffers in January ... full council met with the new workers in a 20-minute closed-door session in January that was neither noticed nor open to the public.

I wonder what made this meeting "sensitive" enough to be exempt from public disclosure. I also wonder where the money came from (salaries, whatever new equipment they might buy).

This, too:

Four years after buying the system, the county in January finally tried to use it

"Spent the money but didn't check to see if it worked."

Reply


Messages In This Thread
technology is "hard" - by kalakoa - 03-20-2015, 05:35 AM
RE: technology is "hard" - by pander75 - 03-20-2015, 07:37 AM
RE: technology is "hard" - by kalakoa - 03-20-2015, 11:12 AM
RE: technology is "hard" - by Rob Tucker - 03-20-2015, 11:39 AM
RE: technology is "hard" - by snorkle - 03-20-2015, 02:34 PM
RE: technology is "hard" - by HereOnThePrimalEdge - 03-20-2015, 03:11 PM
RE: technology is "hard" - by pahoated - 03-21-2015, 10:42 AM
RE: technology is "hard" - by kalakoa - 03-21-2015, 11:25 AM
RE: technology is "hard" - by pahoated - 03-21-2015, 05:05 PM
RE: technology is "hard" - by kalakoa - 03-22-2015, 03:46 AM
RE: technology is "hard" - by leilanidude - 03-22-2015, 08:08 AM
RE: technology is "hard" - by kalakoa - 03-22-2015, 08:15 AM
RE: technology is "hard" - by HereOnThePrimalEdge - 03-22-2015, 09:04 AM
RE: technology is "hard" - by kalakoa - 03-22-2015, 09:09 AM
RE: technology is "hard" - by HereOnThePrimalEdge - 03-22-2015, 09:16 AM
RE: technology is "hard" - by PauHana - 03-23-2015, 03:03 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)