05-09-2015, 04:37 AM
When she says she is not in agreement with the movement at least on certain points I am able to understand. When she then turns around and defends, even by silence, the movement when they reiterate the very points that she said she is not in agreement with, I am not able to understand. This has to do with dealing with reality.
Yes, if it is really about sovereignty, don't mention the water table. More reality.
Yes, if it is really about sovereignty, don't mention the water table. More reality.