06-25-2015, 10:01 AM
I don't know what subdivisions you all live in but there are other subdivisions airing their dirty laundry out there too. PW provides a place for us to discuss our issues, thank you very much Rob. It also provides us the venue for education.
Those few recent comments by a few non HPP owners were nasty and uncalled for. No one is forcing anyone to read this thread or has said any of you can't comment. I don't understand why someone would criticize this thread yet read and post on it. I recognize one as a hit and run poster, stirring the pot for the fun of it. Sort of childish IMO. It's also ironic to accuse HPP posters of negativity when the non HPP posters perpetuate negativity instead of offering something positive. kalakoa's posts are at times more informational and educational.
It's very unfortunate that HPP's management has had a history of problems. Our main issue is and will always be that it's being managed by volunteers. There is no accountability w/volunteers and that is the whole thing in a nutshell.
Volunteers come and go which breaks up the continuity of history, management experience, lack of respect of what others have done before to improve the mgmt of HPP...policies and business files get lost or go missing, forcing others to start from square 1. This is such a disservice to the association.
Volunteers w/personal agendas is never in the best interest of an association and all it takes is one person in an officer position to affect a whole association in an adverse way. Especially if board peers don't hold these kinds of individuals accountable and so it continues. I believe we'll continue to have problems, sometimes worse or better depending on the board makeup, as long as volunteers are managing HPP.
I've heard this discussion of subdivisions joining together to sue the county, and for HPP to go after the Watamulls as well. Last I heard from Rob Tucker, no subdivision has taken the first step to get the ball rolling. Is that still the case?
Those few recent comments by a few non HPP owners were nasty and uncalled for. No one is forcing anyone to read this thread or has said any of you can't comment. I don't understand why someone would criticize this thread yet read and post on it. I recognize one as a hit and run poster, stirring the pot for the fun of it. Sort of childish IMO. It's also ironic to accuse HPP posters of negativity when the non HPP posters perpetuate negativity instead of offering something positive. kalakoa's posts are at times more informational and educational.
It's very unfortunate that HPP's management has had a history of problems. Our main issue is and will always be that it's being managed by volunteers. There is no accountability w/volunteers and that is the whole thing in a nutshell.
Volunteers come and go which breaks up the continuity of history, management experience, lack of respect of what others have done before to improve the mgmt of HPP...policies and business files get lost or go missing, forcing others to start from square 1. This is such a disservice to the association.
Volunteers w/personal agendas is never in the best interest of an association and all it takes is one person in an officer position to affect a whole association in an adverse way. Especially if board peers don't hold these kinds of individuals accountable and so it continues. I believe we'll continue to have problems, sometimes worse or better depending on the board makeup, as long as volunteers are managing HPP.
I've heard this discussion of subdivisions joining together to sue the county, and for HPP to go after the Watamulls as well. Last I heard from Rob Tucker, no subdivision has taken the first step to get the ball rolling. Is that still the case?