08-07-2015, 04:35 PM
hulagirl, so much for your being a positive person blah blah blah. I know you have your own "blog" so why don't you just focus your energy there? You've had your agenda to get something done to your road soon and it's good to be friendly and helpful w/those that make these decisions. How about supporting your fellow members in wanting the board to follow our bylaws and policies?
The library BTW isn't going to happen from what I understand because we have no infrastructure. Joy didn't do her homework and was surprised to discover this at the June membership mtg when she was a guest speaker.
The May 2015 board minutes are also posted as membership mtg minutes on our website.
We could end up having the same employee issues. As long as the VP is on the HRC and chairperson...so it's possible this is/was her agenda w/Susan leaving. I sure hope we don't get a repeat of what happened last time. Fraternizing only causes dysfunction and a disservice to the association from my observations.
This time round, there should be more than 1 applicant, and include resumes ahead of time for the board to review before they vote to hire at a board mtg. We have a GM now that will have his own input as well as to who gets hired, if he's allowed to have his own input. Last time there supposedly was a screening committee composed of unknown board members that never was formed at a board mtg and only one applicant each was considered for the admin and collections position. If the process is done right, it will give all of us a lot more confidence in the board's actions and who is hired.
The library BTW isn't going to happen from what I understand because we have no infrastructure. Joy didn't do her homework and was surprised to discover this at the June membership mtg when she was a guest speaker.
The May 2015 board minutes are also posted as membership mtg minutes on our website.
We could end up having the same employee issues. As long as the VP is on the HRC and chairperson...so it's possible this is/was her agenda w/Susan leaving. I sure hope we don't get a repeat of what happened last time. Fraternizing only causes dysfunction and a disservice to the association from my observations.
This time round, there should be more than 1 applicant, and include resumes ahead of time for the board to review before they vote to hire at a board mtg. We have a GM now that will have his own input as well as to who gets hired, if he's allowed to have his own input. Last time there supposedly was a screening committee composed of unknown board members that never was formed at a board mtg and only one applicant each was considered for the admin and collections position. If the process is done right, it will give all of us a lot more confidence in the board's actions and who is hired.