08-25-2015, 08:57 AM
"No it couldn't. What the Kingdom is trying to do is directly related to what the US/State of Hawaii did. In the original argument what the US did had nothing to do with Hawaii's past, but he was using it as his argument for what the US did."
This is getting really convoluted. Situations don't have to be carbon copies of each other to be relevant to each other. Complex interrelationships are everywhere. And there are multiple ways of looking at things which can hold truth. I think you are trying to limit what qualifies as admissible here based on your own personal point of view, opinion, and perhaps your own agenda. In any case, there was no Red Herring.
This is getting really convoluted. Situations don't have to be carbon copies of each other to be relevant to each other. Complex interrelationships are everywhere. And there are multiple ways of looking at things which can hold truth. I think you are trying to limit what qualifies as admissible here based on your own personal point of view, opinion, and perhaps your own agenda. In any case, there was no Red Herring.