11-07-2015, 01:46 PM
Originally posted by janet
Article IX, Section 5. Treasurer, (e) Obtain monthly financial reports from the general manager including an income and expense statement which will be distributed to directors and made available to the members.
___________
Here lies most of the problem IMHO....the interim GM didn't provide this info nor has the current GM. That's her 8-9 mos on the job and his 6-7 mos now. It is their responsibility as stated in our bylaws to provide these reports to the Treasurer AND GM is to distribute to the directors and make available to members.
The GM's job isn't in aligment w/our bylaws as I've pointed out previously. Duties were written out of the job descript. Who is responsible for that? The previous HRC1-2 rewrote the GM job descript. The board didn't task HRC1-2 to do this. This board didn't task this HRC to rewrite job descripts either. Who's the common denominator in all this?
Who was/is responsible for performing those GM duties described in the bylaws? I don't think this was utmost in anyone's mind since July 2014 after wiping the slate clean. They have said publicly they're forward thinking and very smart people, but ironically they've taken us back to the dark ages.
The current HRC are aware of this issue. Until that's fixed, I think we may continue to see things fall through the cracks.
Article IX, Section 5. Treasurer, (e) Obtain monthly financial reports from the general manager including an income and expense statement which will be distributed to directors and made available to the members.
___________
Here lies most of the problem IMHO....the interim GM didn't provide this info nor has the current GM. That's her 8-9 mos on the job and his 6-7 mos now. It is their responsibility as stated in our bylaws to provide these reports to the Treasurer AND GM is to distribute to the directors and make available to members.
The GM's job isn't in aligment w/our bylaws as I've pointed out previously. Duties were written out of the job descript. Who is responsible for that? The previous HRC1-2 rewrote the GM job descript. The board didn't task HRC1-2 to do this. This board didn't task this HRC to rewrite job descripts either. Who's the common denominator in all this?
Who was/is responsible for performing those GM duties described in the bylaws? I don't think this was utmost in anyone's mind since July 2014 after wiping the slate clean. They have said publicly they're forward thinking and very smart people, but ironically they've taken us back to the dark ages.
The current HRC are aware of this issue. Until that's fixed, I think we may continue to see things fall through the cracks.