11-16-2015, 04:42 AM
Originally posted by kalakoa:
July's mtg show some of the board in a bad light so maybe that's why????
I'm sure the timing is just a coincidence.
_______________
If it's a coincidence then why are all the other minutes posted that preceded it and why has August's been posted? July's minutes were approved months ago. This is intentional, just like the excuses and reasons to not release financial information that financial committee members have asked for some time ago. All members are privy to this information.
If there's nothing to hide, all HPP biz would be done in a timely manner and information released w/out resistance. The audit has to do with what has occurred over the past year that they've been managing HPP, which includes the time frame of having an interim GM and interim Treasurer. I really don't think they anticipated that a handful of members would be this observant, knowledgeable and insistent on accountability and a few of them are turning up the heat now.
A petition was in the office recently that involved the business of chip seal. Perhaps this has opened the door for other petitions to use this venue, even a recall petition. But it prob has to be approved first by a cpl board members to ensure it's in alignment w/their agenda.
It will take another membership mtg and membership vote to change the motion. The petition's signatures won't count as votes. An attempt was made at the membership mtg to alter the motion after it passed and it failed so now we have this petition. Who approved using the ofc for a petition, and who's petition is this?
July's mtg show some of the board in a bad light so maybe that's why????
I'm sure the timing is just a coincidence.
_______________
If it's a coincidence then why are all the other minutes posted that preceded it and why has August's been posted? July's minutes were approved months ago. This is intentional, just like the excuses and reasons to not release financial information that financial committee members have asked for some time ago. All members are privy to this information.
If there's nothing to hide, all HPP biz would be done in a timely manner and information released w/out resistance. The audit has to do with what has occurred over the past year that they've been managing HPP, which includes the time frame of having an interim GM and interim Treasurer. I really don't think they anticipated that a handful of members would be this observant, knowledgeable and insistent on accountability and a few of them are turning up the heat now.
A petition was in the office recently that involved the business of chip seal. Perhaps this has opened the door for other petitions to use this venue, even a recall petition. But it prob has to be approved first by a cpl board members to ensure it's in alignment w/their agenda.
It will take another membership mtg and membership vote to change the motion. The petition's signatures won't count as votes. An attempt was made at the membership mtg to alter the motion after it passed and it failed so now we have this petition. Who approved using the ofc for a petition, and who's petition is this?