01-14-2016, 06:51 AM
Kalakoa, can't you say something more constructive and helpful? We're already feeling downtrodden w/the state we're in. Please...
Arbitration is the only way to clear up this convoluted mess w/the FC. The board hired an atty to see if the board can overturn membership votes. An atty only hears their side and we're paying for it. The Treasurer and VP are pulling the lawsuit card I believe to justify the non transparency that's been going on. Until this is resolved through arbitration, the 2 new FC members should be on the FC and the 2 recently ousted FC members should continue on w/their work on the FC.
There's nothing unethical or illegal over simply adding 2 new members to a committee at a membership mtg. If anything, it's a good thing. Why such resistance against assoc members by these board members? Is this about their losing voting control? Or is there something more concerning going on?
The VP hasn't been a bonafide FC member since June 2015. The board didn't appoint the VP to the FC in the month of June or anytime thereafter. None of the board mtg minutes show this ever occurred. If it was done in an exec session recently, the board should provide copies of the exec session minutes to the membership. All her past FC votes are null and void as is her board appt if it was done illegally in exec session.
Members haven't been given a copy of the atty letter stating the board can overturn the membership vote on the FC issue, or the chip seal issue. The board is proceeding with both issues no matter what the membership voted. They should provide the membership copies of the atty letter. And then they should start the process of arbitration to resolve these matters fairly and per our bylaws when a dispute arises w/the interpretation of our bylaws.
Arbitration is the only way to clear up this convoluted mess w/the FC. The board hired an atty to see if the board can overturn membership votes. An atty only hears their side and we're paying for it. The Treasurer and VP are pulling the lawsuit card I believe to justify the non transparency that's been going on. Until this is resolved through arbitration, the 2 new FC members should be on the FC and the 2 recently ousted FC members should continue on w/their work on the FC.
There's nothing unethical or illegal over simply adding 2 new members to a committee at a membership mtg. If anything, it's a good thing. Why such resistance against assoc members by these board members? Is this about their losing voting control? Or is there something more concerning going on?
The VP hasn't been a bonafide FC member since June 2015. The board didn't appoint the VP to the FC in the month of June or anytime thereafter. None of the board mtg minutes show this ever occurred. If it was done in an exec session recently, the board should provide copies of the exec session minutes to the membership. All her past FC votes are null and void as is her board appt if it was done illegally in exec session.
Members haven't been given a copy of the atty letter stating the board can overturn the membership vote on the FC issue, or the chip seal issue. The board is proceeding with both issues no matter what the membership voted. They should provide the membership copies of the atty letter. And then they should start the process of arbitration to resolve these matters fairly and per our bylaws when a dispute arises w/the interpretation of our bylaws.