02-24-2016, 06:25 AM
quote:
Originally posted by kalakoa
They have broken so many by-laws and state statutes and rubbed our noses in it.
Again, yet, still: the owners/members are allowing the board to continue, therefore these conditions must be acceptable to the majority who refuse to act.
Nor is it clear how pseudonymous ranting in a public forum will have any affect -- the dysfunctional board is already ignoring bylaws and statutes, why would they care about the peanut gallery?
You are assuming that the posts here are directed to the board, rather than the membership.
You also are assuming that the memberships is "allowing" this to continue. The reality is there are very few mechanisms to control a rogue board that do not rely on paying lawyers and going to court to force the board into a court ordered supervision, so the next election is the only real opportunity to turn things around. However, no reasonable person is going to want to get involved in a situation that could be headed to court. If only a minority of the board wants to follow the by laws and state law the minority could end up in court right along with the people who are choosing to not follow the law and by laws, who would want to put themselves in that situation? I would guess that several of the people who got on and then got off the board rapidly realized there was no stopping the momentum of this board and bailed rather than end up in court with the scofflaws.