07-19-2016, 04:34 AM
To some extent, Eric1600. Some stated one (1), two (2), six (6), etc., including Amano (who has witnesses). "They all" did not state "10".
The requirement for names, and testimony, was due twenty days (20) from the last hearing (as I recall). In the room, many of the Plaintiff's changed their number to a lower number given Amano's conditions regarding witnesses. The witness list will be finalized when the documents requested are provided. To date, some documents are still being held by AG's office, and BLNR. That is the argument in the links above.
PaulW, the precedent was set by the State, not the protestors, by usurping their own laws. Again, the Supreme Court agreed with the protestors in their ruling. You would think the State would follow the laws in place, given the "higher stakes" kalakoa mentions.
JMO.
ETA: Fix quote; something went wrong. Removed quote from Eric1600.
The requirement for names, and testimony, was due twenty days (20) from the last hearing (as I recall). In the room, many of the Plaintiff's changed their number to a lower number given Amano's conditions regarding witnesses. The witness list will be finalized when the documents requested are provided. To date, some documents are still being held by AG's office, and BLNR. That is the argument in the links above.
PaulW, the precedent was set by the State, not the protestors, by usurping their own laws. Again, the Supreme Court agreed with the protestors in their ruling. You would think the State would follow the laws in place, given the "higher stakes" kalakoa mentions.
JMO.
ETA: Fix quote; something went wrong. Removed quote from Eric1600.