07-20-2016, 07:54 AM
their "weasel out" is that " it is designated Ag land because of the hazard
Disagree: it's designated "ag" to avoid any "requirements", which fact is well-documented.
show unanimously to government that Puna is too hazardous to live in
Government already uses that excuse at its convenience. "Too hazardous to build public infrastructure -- yet magically not very hazardous when we require building permits."
Again, be very, very careful in what you wish for.
Enough people are invested in constructive ignorance that these will remain just that, wishes.
Note, however, the recurring theme: let's all commit to something and move forward with it.
Disagree: it's designated "ag" to avoid any "requirements", which fact is well-documented.
show unanimously to government that Puna is too hazardous to live in
Government already uses that excuse at its convenience. "Too hazardous to build public infrastructure -- yet magically not very hazardous when we require building permits."
Again, be very, very careful in what you wish for.
Enough people are invested in constructive ignorance that these will remain just that, wishes.
Note, however, the recurring theme: let's all commit to something and move forward with it.