07-24-2016, 06:14 AM
Imemine wrote - "I don’t consider meteorology (at least when it comes to predicting the weather) to be a science as much as a branch of such that is under development." All science is under development, that said, I would agree that meteorology is, shall we say, behind the quotient in progressive advancements.
IMO, there's an unfortunate reason for this and it goes back to the fundamental adoption of what's known as the Coriolis Effect. The lions share of the research is based on those phenomina subject to said effect. The derivative of this is convection, conduction, etc. This is where the instrumentation work is focused. Measuring those aspects solely.
The interesting aspect is that while the Coriolist Effect gives us one explanation for rotational attributes based on the rotation of the Earth it has largly been the only considered driving force of rotation on the Earth scale systems. There is another known causation for rotation and it's one seldom discussed with enough potential importance when it come to Earth storm and climate systems.
Electrical exchange through a fluid, within a magnetic field, induces rotation. This important because we're fully aware that Earth facilitates a powerful electromagnet system. That system is not yet properly understood and as a consiquence (IMO), meteorology will continue to work as a largly handicapped member of the scientific community.
To add to that as a question to consider. Does the chemical composition of volcanic off gassing, when introduced into a storm system play any role in affecting a storm system? If so, how so? Is there an electracal aspect involved in a storm system and if so, do the composition of gasses play any role in said conductivy of storm system and its rotational attributes?
IMO, there's an unfortunate reason for this and it goes back to the fundamental adoption of what's known as the Coriolis Effect. The lions share of the research is based on those phenomina subject to said effect. The derivative of this is convection, conduction, etc. This is where the instrumentation work is focused. Measuring those aspects solely.
The interesting aspect is that while the Coriolist Effect gives us one explanation for rotational attributes based on the rotation of the Earth it has largly been the only considered driving force of rotation on the Earth scale systems. There is another known causation for rotation and it's one seldom discussed with enough potential importance when it come to Earth storm and climate systems.
Electrical exchange through a fluid, within a magnetic field, induces rotation. This important because we're fully aware that Earth facilitates a powerful electromagnet system. That system is not yet properly understood and as a consiquence (IMO), meteorology will continue to work as a largly handicapped member of the scientific community.
To add to that as a question to consider. Does the chemical composition of volcanic off gassing, when introduced into a storm system play any role in affecting a storm system? If so, how so? Is there an electracal aspect involved in a storm system and if so, do the composition of gasses play any role in said conductivy of storm system and its rotational attributes?