Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Protectors required (don't apply via FB)
#22
Eric1600 - He cannot restrict beach access. State law. In fact, if beach access is restricted by terrain or something else he could be required to provide an easement for access. It's happened many times before. George Harrison comes to mind.

"Close to a dozen small parcels within Zuckerberg’s Kauai estate are owned by kamaaina families who have rights to traverse the billionaire’s otherwise private domain."

If the properties were all contiguous to each other then I could see him providing an easement to them, it would be a lot easier than all of this, but I can understand why he would not want to provide a dozen separate easements or allow access willy nilly.

And as far as the 20 days notice to respond, this is pretty much standard procedure, and the response could be as simple as "let's talk about this." The guy who is saying that Zuckerberg has the best lawyers in the world and that these Kamaaina owners need to lawyer up against him all in the same sentence is out of his mind. Or looking to stir up the situation and profit from it, perhaps?

Until an actual owner steps up and provides arguments against this instead of outsider speculation, I will see it as a win win situation.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Protectors required (don't apply via FB) - by My 2 cents - 01-20-2017, 07:06 AM
RE: Protectors required (don't apply via FB) - by Guest - 01-20-2017, 09:12 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)