Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Protectors required (don't apply via FB)
#45
Now this makes more sense. These minority owners have access rights through his property.

Would that be similar to this from a page back?
I was under the impression that there were owners and families against the sale as it would block their access to the ancestral property and other rights they had in conjunction with it.

Because if they sign off, and sell, they would lose their access rights. Is that correct?

"Only fear real things, such as minds full of delusions." -Last Aphorisms
"I'm at that stage in life where I stay out of discussions. Even if you say 1+1=5, you're right - have fun." - Keanu Reeves
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Protectors required (don't apply via FB) - by Guest - 01-20-2017, 09:12 AM
RE: Protectors required (don't apply via FB) - by HereOnThePrimalEdge - 01-25-2017, 06:25 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)