HPP Biz

[mermaid53]

New Biz:
Forensic Accountant Discussion: The pres made a motion to accept moving forward to have a forensic analysis bc the membership voted unanimously for it, despite the talk of the costs, members thought the $ would be well spent vs not knowing what's been going on w/their $ for yrs. It got voted down pending what it would cost. The pres reminded them that the membership already had that discussion about the money at the membership mtg but still voted unanimously for it. Her motion didn't pass. Dist 2 Mizuba didn't think the board should have to do what the membership votes for at a membership mtg. (It's state law and Mizuba has a habit of dismissing this specific state law. As long as there was a quorum voting, it becomes "the acts of the membership".) Old reps mentioned they don't have to do what the membership wants.

I have a correction to make about the above topic. The majority board voted the forensic analysis down, period. It's a NO from the majority board. Dist 5, 3 and 7 were the only ones who voted YES. Despite a 55+ unanimous vote of YES at the membership mtg. YOU should ask the rest of the board why they don't want a forensic analysis...