12-18-2017, 08:54 AM
The reason these fees were written off is because they are beyond the statute of limitations
I had not heard before that this was part of the Murakami outcome. Do you have a link/source for this?
It wasn't part of the court's decision because the court didn't rule on the amounts owed. The court merely said that it was done wrong and you need to start over. The issue of statute of limitations was conceded by OLCA's attorney after Murakami's deposition of Steve Starnes. Here is the link to Stuart Oda's explanation of the court's decision and recommendations for future procedure.
http://www.orchidland.org/pdf/MurakamiJu...sponse.pdf
I had not heard before that this was part of the Murakami outcome. Do you have a link/source for this?
It wasn't part of the court's decision because the court didn't rule on the amounts owed. The court merely said that it was done wrong and you need to start over. The issue of statute of limitations was conceded by OLCA's attorney after Murakami's deposition of Steve Starnes. Here is the link to Stuart Oda's explanation of the court's decision and recommendations for future procedure.
http://www.orchidland.org/pdf/MurakamiJu...sponse.pdf