Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Special Master recommends Orchidland receivership
#63
quote:
Originally posted by Chunkster

O'hara's bill was seen by the anti-PMAR crowd in HPP as a ploy to enable an eventual route through the subdivision. It was seen by the county as a back door way to make them responsible for at least a portion of the substandard private roads they enabled once upon a time. Obviously, it went nowhere.


Ah, but maybe it did go somewhere.

"Based on the need to protect public health and safety"

Wouldn't this add fodder to our complaint? Not only did the county break their own laws in approving these subdivisions, but in doing so they have put our health and safety at risk.

Yes, I believe this is total bs, but if they're going to hide behind this kind of crap we might as well throw it back at them. Doesn't this make the situation all the more urgent?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Special Master recommends Orchidland receivership - by My 2 cents - 12-27-2017, 03:09 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)