01-13-2018, 03:13 PM
Obie, right on cue as expected on an HPP thread...
As a lot owner, former board member, and former BLC member, you should know our bylaws and Articles of Incorp. Article VIII Sec 8 "Except for the limitations set by the Articles of Incorp and by these bylaws as to actions to be authorized or approved by the membership, and subject to the duties of the directors as prescribed by the bylaws....", and the Charter of Incorp, Powers and Obligations "To appoint such subordinate officers and agents as the business of the corporation requires." The board works FOR the association, does it's business FOR the membership, and it does NOT have sole authority over the membership in ALL decisions.
The intent is clear by both documents that the membership is to be involved and have a voice...i.e. a vote by the membership at a membership meeting is the "acts of the membership". The intent was not to be managed by a dictator board. State law 414D states that any vote taken at a membership meeting where a quorum is met, IS THE ACTS OF THE MEMBERSHIP. Therefore, the board HAS TO arrange for a forensic analysis since that's what we voted for and there is NO reason not to.
IMO, any efforts to obstruct the forensic analysis says a lot about the obstructionists. Are you one of them and why?
As a lot owner, former board member, and former BLC member, you should know our bylaws and Articles of Incorp. Article VIII Sec 8 "Except for the limitations set by the Articles of Incorp and by these bylaws as to actions to be authorized or approved by the membership, and subject to the duties of the directors as prescribed by the bylaws....", and the Charter of Incorp, Powers and Obligations "To appoint such subordinate officers and agents as the business of the corporation requires." The board works FOR the association, does it's business FOR the membership, and it does NOT have sole authority over the membership in ALL decisions.
The intent is clear by both documents that the membership is to be involved and have a voice...i.e. a vote by the membership at a membership meeting is the "acts of the membership". The intent was not to be managed by a dictator board. State law 414D states that any vote taken at a membership meeting where a quorum is met, IS THE ACTS OF THE MEMBERSHIP. Therefore, the board HAS TO arrange for a forensic analysis since that's what we voted for and there is NO reason not to.
IMO, any efforts to obstruct the forensic analysis says a lot about the obstructionists. Are you one of them and why?