02-28-2018, 01:54 PM
they are protected by the constitution after all
It could be argued that this "protection" only extends to the firearms that existed at the time the Constitution was written.
A surcharge that is directly tied to the cost that each type of ammo levies
Like the existing Pittman-Robertson funds?
It could be argued that this "protection" only extends to the firearms that existed at the time the Constitution was written.
A surcharge that is directly tied to the cost that each type of ammo levies
Like the existing Pittman-Robertson funds?