03-05-2018, 05:16 AM
As I read HB2570, the LID is by no means mandatory.
Except for the part where it can be established by court order...
such an tax district would be for "repair and maintenance of subdivision roads" and not construction of paved roads
Point being: HB2570 is vague. Pavement would be a valid "repair", especially as one of the stated goals is "to improve emergency response".
Fortunately, we can always follow HPP's fine example and spend money on lawsuits instead of roads.
Except for the part where it can be established by court order...
such an tax district would be for "repair and maintenance of subdivision roads" and not construction of paved roads
Point being: HB2570 is vague. Pavement would be a valid "repair", especially as one of the stated goals is "to improve emergency response".
Fortunately, we can always follow HPP's fine example and spend money on lawsuits instead of roads.