03-19-2018, 05:27 AM
I guess I'm seeing them as the lesser of 3 evils. I agree with you about proxy voting. On the surface it seems like a way to provide more voice, but in practice it has been abused. Very sneaky the way they started using it. Creative interpretation of the laws/bylaws is nothing new. Arthurs group wants to limit voting, and receivership furthers that agenda. It's a wash, and we could spend all day pointing out the bad things of all sides. For now, it is the court that is giving them the benefit of the doubt. Not with a decision, but with approval of an agreement between the 2 sides. I'm simply reporting on that, and trying to solicit more input from others who are closer to the situation.
The good things that I see:
1. They are doing a good job on the roads.
2. They are using the community lot for community activities.
3. They are recognizing the difficulty and lack of cost effectiveness of collections, and recognizing certain amounts as uncollectible. At least they were. We shall see if this holds true.
4. The recent newsletter states that they are looking into county accountability. I don't know how far they will take this, but it's a good direction that no other board has been willing to pursue. It's a bright spot, in my opinion. Getting OLCA out of the road business would clean up 99% of the fighting.
The good things that I see:
1. They are doing a good job on the roads.
2. They are using the community lot for community activities.
3. They are recognizing the difficulty and lack of cost effectiveness of collections, and recognizing certain amounts as uncollectible. At least they were. We shall see if this holds true.
4. The recent newsletter states that they are looking into county accountability. I don't know how far they will take this, but it's a good direction that no other board has been willing to pursue. It's a bright spot, in my opinion. Getting OLCA out of the road business would clean up 99% of the fighting.