03-30-2018, 01:15 PM
Originally posted by New to HPP:
I am confused, why would they offer someone who is running in a district opposed to come on the board early instead of offering the district 5 candidate who is unopposed to fill the district 5 seat. The way that it was done looks like they are trying to manipulate the district 4 vote. By offering the district 5 unopposed candidate the seat early there is no perception of manipulation.
Do you know if any other members filled out applications to fill the district 5 opening.
Am I the only one who is beginning to see that the corruption allegations seem to be true.
Good question. Board Appointed Dist6 rep P Murdoch said no other candidates were asked...
Yes I agree, it does raise some questions. The majority board should be avoiding any perceptions of election manipulations at all costs.
I am confused, why would they offer someone who is running in a district opposed to come on the board early instead of offering the district 5 candidate who is unopposed to fill the district 5 seat. The way that it was done looks like they are trying to manipulate the district 4 vote. By offering the district 5 unopposed candidate the seat early there is no perception of manipulation.
Do you know if any other members filled out applications to fill the district 5 opening.
Am I the only one who is beginning to see that the corruption allegations seem to be true.
Good question. Board Appointed Dist6 rep P Murdoch said no other candidates were asked...
Yes I agree, it does raise some questions. The majority board should be avoiding any perceptions of election manipulations at all costs.