04-20-2018, 07:13 AM
As a non-HPP resident/landowner, it's obvious that I simply don't understand their governance.
Then again, if HPP were fully functional, the residents would find themselves gentrified right out of their subdivision. I believe this is actually the long-range plan.
HPP's had no recognizable governance for awhile which is what happens when they don't follow the bylaws and state law... it has morphed into a whacko dictatorship. Continuance of this is these rep's long range plan and it will continue if people vote these same reps back on the board in this election.
First we need to find out what's going on with our money via a Forensic Analysis since the majority board and some employees are obstructing transparency which obviously raises BIG red flags if they've nothing to hide. This has been going on for almost 3 yrs now because the membership at large haven't held them accountable.
The proposed long range plan for members who voted at the membership meeting, is professional management. As some of you know, board obstruction is going on right now to prevent both items from proceeding, hence the obstruction of the Bylaw's Committee ballot being mailed to the entire membership for vote.
As I said earlier in another post here, the board voted AGAIN, on 18 April 2018, to hire an attorney to find out if they can stop the ballot, and shut down the membership committees that the members voted for. Don't know if the 2nd vote to seek legal counsel is for a 2nd opinion.
It's unethical and reckless spending of OUR money, to challenge the membership's votes and we don't get equal opportunity to represent our side to the attorney....it's all one sided, and that should be challenged with the board. We should also demand they post their letter/s to the attorney/s and the attorney's response to them, all correspondence in case this is a 2nd opinion they're seeking.
BTW, the League of Womens Voter organization received an HPP bylaw proposal ballot in their mailbox. The LWV had declined us, therefore, no contract had been signed, yet they received an HPP ballot and were not happy about that since they are receiving ballots from another client right now. I have no other information as to whether they received more than 1 ballot, and appt'd rep Patrick Murdoch would have that information. Someone on the board or an employee had access to the BLC ballot, as the BLC had sent them a sample to send to the printers, that had the LWV address on it (wishful thinking on BLC's part to have LWV do the ballot counting).
Complacency is our enemy...please keep on keeping on. The only way change is going to happen is to be part of that change. Please attend meetings, both board and membership and participate by voting if your district is up for election.
Then again, if HPP were fully functional, the residents would find themselves gentrified right out of their subdivision. I believe this is actually the long-range plan.
HPP's had no recognizable governance for awhile which is what happens when they don't follow the bylaws and state law... it has morphed into a whacko dictatorship. Continuance of this is these rep's long range plan and it will continue if people vote these same reps back on the board in this election.
First we need to find out what's going on with our money via a Forensic Analysis since the majority board and some employees are obstructing transparency which obviously raises BIG red flags if they've nothing to hide. This has been going on for almost 3 yrs now because the membership at large haven't held them accountable.
The proposed long range plan for members who voted at the membership meeting, is professional management. As some of you know, board obstruction is going on right now to prevent both items from proceeding, hence the obstruction of the Bylaw's Committee ballot being mailed to the entire membership for vote.
As I said earlier in another post here, the board voted AGAIN, on 18 April 2018, to hire an attorney to find out if they can stop the ballot, and shut down the membership committees that the members voted for. Don't know if the 2nd vote to seek legal counsel is for a 2nd opinion.
It's unethical and reckless spending of OUR money, to challenge the membership's votes and we don't get equal opportunity to represent our side to the attorney....it's all one sided, and that should be challenged with the board. We should also demand they post their letter/s to the attorney/s and the attorney's response to them, all correspondence in case this is a 2nd opinion they're seeking.
BTW, the League of Womens Voter organization received an HPP bylaw proposal ballot in their mailbox. The LWV had declined us, therefore, no contract had been signed, yet they received an HPP ballot and were not happy about that since they are receiving ballots from another client right now. I have no other information as to whether they received more than 1 ballot, and appt'd rep Patrick Murdoch would have that information. Someone on the board or an employee had access to the BLC ballot, as the BLC had sent them a sample to send to the printers, that had the LWV address on it (wishful thinking on BLC's part to have LWV do the ballot counting).
Complacency is our enemy...please keep on keeping on. The only way change is going to happen is to be part of that change. Please attend meetings, both board and membership and participate by voting if your district is up for election.