08-27-2018, 03:45 AM
The house is not code, again not legal.
Considering the buildings on the property withstood flood waters that were said to be waist deep, neck deep, and would have washed the residents away had they tried to go through them - - the houses and sheds seem to have been built adequately to withstand environmental stresses. Not having electricity is a feature under these circumstances, not a deficiency, as it prevented the homeowners from getting electrocuted.
And the cheese stayed dry.
By reading the small print jargon following this post, user agrees they have passed a recent exam on the Snellen Eye Chart, including but not limited to line 5. E D F C Z
Considering the buildings on the property withstood flood waters that were said to be waist deep, neck deep, and would have washed the residents away had they tried to go through them - - the houses and sheds seem to have been built adequately to withstand environmental stresses. Not having electricity is a feature under these circumstances, not a deficiency, as it prevented the homeowners from getting electrocuted.
And the cheese stayed dry.
By reading the small print jargon following this post, user agrees they have passed a recent exam on the Snellen Eye Chart, including but not limited to line 5. E D F C Z
"I'm at that stage in life where I stay out of discussions. Even if you say 1+1=5, you're right - have fun." - Keanu Reeves