11-28-2018, 04:25 AM
“This is now a statement coming from the federal government admitting that everything here is true,” Sai asserted. “Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. It’s just which court. Makes sense?”
-Dr Sai
No.
That makes no sense.
When Dr Sai files a suit in a court, he claims he won because they’ve accepted his petition.
When Dr Sai has his suit rejected by the court he claims he won because “No way you can falsify this stuff. This thing has gone through... Law Review. Okay, we’ll go through a U.S. attorney now and you found something? ... They’re only talking jurisdiction, so they can’t review the claims.”. So Dr Sai both claims it went through a Law Review, but the claims also could not be reviewed??? I get so dizzy trying to follow his logic, It would be less disoriented spending an hour on an EK Fernandez ride at the Couny Fair.
If Dr Sai is incapable of interpreting the legal standing his submissions have in the courts, in the present day, how accurate can we expect his many, many interpretations of laws and treaties over one hundred years old are? Laws and treaties which are currently accepted by no courts, countries, or legal entities in the world today? Except by Dr Sai and his dedicated, hopeful, acolytes.
I’d say he’s a snake oil salesman, but he probably wouldn’t deny whether or not the old saying accurately describes his actions, simply that it must be dismissed on legal grounds as there are no snakes in Hawaii. He wins again! Victory!
"I want great climate, we’re going to have that.” President Donald J. Trump, while viewing the massive wildfire devastation 11/17/18. (The J stands for Jenius)
-Dr Sai
No.
That makes no sense.
When Dr Sai files a suit in a court, he claims he won because they’ve accepted his petition.
When Dr Sai has his suit rejected by the court he claims he won because “No way you can falsify this stuff. This thing has gone through... Law Review. Okay, we’ll go through a U.S. attorney now and you found something? ... They’re only talking jurisdiction, so they can’t review the claims.”. So Dr Sai both claims it went through a Law Review, but the claims also could not be reviewed??? I get so dizzy trying to follow his logic, It would be less disoriented spending an hour on an EK Fernandez ride at the Couny Fair.
If Dr Sai is incapable of interpreting the legal standing his submissions have in the courts, in the present day, how accurate can we expect his many, many interpretations of laws and treaties over one hundred years old are? Laws and treaties which are currently accepted by no courts, countries, or legal entities in the world today? Except by Dr Sai and his dedicated, hopeful, acolytes.
I’d say he’s a snake oil salesman, but he probably wouldn’t deny whether or not the old saying accurately describes his actions, simply that it must be dismissed on legal grounds as there are no snakes in Hawaii. He wins again! Victory!
"I want great climate, we’re going to have that.” President Donald J. Trump, while viewing the massive wildfire devastation 11/17/18. (The J stands for Jenius)
"I'm at that stage in life where I stay out of discussions. Even if you say 1+1=5, you're right - have fun." - Keanu Reeves