Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Building Assessment
#4
Perhaps not letting developers buy out of their low cost housing commitment. You read many articles in the paper, today 3 articles where businesses go back on their commitments and just pay the $150,000.00 fine, that goes into the governments pocket and doesn't solve the problem. Perhaps if developers were responsible for building the low income part of the project first, or even simultaneously and then upon completion doing the high end part this might help.

In regards to the Ohana I like the idea if it is for family but there again who is willing to regulate this and where will those funds come from?

mella l

Edited by - mella l on 09/20/2006 09:04:38
mella l
Art and Science
bytheSEA
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Building Assessment - by Kapohocat - 09-20-2006, 03:39 AM
RE: Building Assessment - by JerryCarr - 09-20-2006, 04:20 AM
RE: Building Assessment - by John S. Rabi - 09-20-2006, 04:50 AM
RE: Building Assessment - by mella l - 09-20-2006, 05:04 AM
RE: Building Assessment - by Lucy - 09-20-2006, 01:17 PM
RE: Building Assessment - by Kelena - 09-20-2006, 01:38 PM
RE: Building Assessment - by toucano - 09-20-2006, 01:51 PM
RE: Building Assessment - by Lucy - 09-20-2006, 02:37 PM
RE: Building Assessment - by David M - 09-20-2006, 05:07 PM
RE: Building Assessment - by toucano - 09-20-2006, 05:35 PM
RE: Building Assessment - by Rob Tucker - 09-20-2006, 07:16 PM
RE: Building Assessment - by Kapohocat - 09-21-2006, 03:57 AM
RE: Building Assessment - by emorata - 09-21-2006, 05:16 AM
RE: Building Assessment - by John S. Rabi - 09-21-2006, 05:46 AM
RE: Building Assessment - by Hotzcatz - 09-21-2006, 05:48 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)