04-26-2019, 06:14 PM
I got used to reading and hearing so much claptrap against the TMT during the recent contested case hearing and court cases, but I have never read anything quite like this. What makes it worse is it was written by a UH professor, someone you would expect to at least have a tenuous grasp of reality. There is so much misinformation in the article it's hard to know where to start, but at least the related comments to the article have made some relevant ones. It's good to see that many realize what utter crap was written in that opinion piece.
Incidentally, the stuff about Mary and Jesus seems to have come about from a misprint, not that Jesus could have saved the rest of the article's nonsense:
"(Correction: Due to an editing error, Mara was changed to Mary in an earlier version of the story.)"
https://www.civilbeat.org/2019/04/the-ca...r-the-tmt/
Incidentally, the stuff about Mary and Jesus seems to have come about from a misprint, not that Jesus could have saved the rest of the article's nonsense:
"(Correction: Due to an editing error, Mara was changed to Mary in an earlier version of the story.)"
https://www.civilbeat.org/2019/04/the-ca...r-the-tmt/