04-29-2019, 02:41 PM
If they allow access roads and development then it's purpose is defeated.
Problem is, the access roads and driveways already exist, and ag development doesn't require review.
For example: Quinn could build a house on that lot. A busy household with several cars could generate as much traffic as a small feed store. All the original issues continue to exist. The problem isn't the feed store.
Similarly, a commercial greenhouse/nursery operation would be an allowable use for the land as currently zoned. Retail sales of produce from the land are explicitly permitted, and the property already includes a State-sanctioned driveway. Quinn should have taken this route and not even bothered asking for an SUP.
Problem is, the access roads and driveways already exist, and ag development doesn't require review.
For example: Quinn could build a house on that lot. A busy household with several cars could generate as much traffic as a small feed store. All the original issues continue to exist. The problem isn't the feed store.
Similarly, a commercial greenhouse/nursery operation would be an allowable use for the land as currently zoned. Retail sales of produce from the land are explicitly permitted, and the property already includes a State-sanctioned driveway. Quinn should have taken this route and not even bothered asking for an SUP.