07-09-2019, 02:22 PM
would have thought the Mauna Kea master plan of 2000 would be more relevant
How relevant and for whom? At this point the "protectors" will invoke any statute that fits their cause, relevance and timeliness notwithstanding.
I won't be surprised if they find TMT in violation of some Territorial law.
Nor do I fail to see the irony: "haole occupier" laws are totally acceptable -- if the TMT is somehow acting illegally -- and conveniently ignored whenever there is a "sacred need".
How relevant and for whom? At this point the "protectors" will invoke any statute that fits their cause, relevance and timeliness notwithstanding.
I won't be surprised if they find TMT in violation of some Territorial law.
Nor do I fail to see the irony: "haole occupier" laws are totally acceptable -- if the TMT is somehow acting illegally -- and conveniently ignored whenever there is a "sacred need".