08-10-2019, 01:23 PM
let's look under the protest "parking lot" and see if there are any "factual spillages"
It would be interesting to make a list of protestor’s objections to the TMT, then see which apply to them. For instance:
* Pollute the water table - TMT no, protestors yes
* Prevent people from experiencing the Mauna Kea summit - TMT no, protestors yes
* Causing traffic problems as gypsy claimed 1 million visitors per year - TMT no, protestors yes (granted less than 1 million, but still a problem on a Saddle Road)
* Permit approval for designated use on Conservation District Land - TMT yes, protestors with structures, kitchens, propane, waste disposal, parking, camping, etc no no no no no etc...
It would be interesting to make a list of protestor’s objections to the TMT, then see which apply to them. For instance:
* Pollute the water table - TMT no, protestors yes
* Prevent people from experiencing the Mauna Kea summit - TMT no, protestors yes
* Causing traffic problems as gypsy claimed 1 million visitors per year - TMT no, protestors yes (granted less than 1 million, but still a problem on a Saddle Road)
* Permit approval for designated use on Conservation District Land - TMT yes, protestors with structures, kitchens, propane, waste disposal, parking, camping, etc no no no no no etc...
"I'm at that stage in life where I stay out of discussions. Even if you say 1+1=5, you're right - have fun." - Keanu Reeves