09-26-2019, 09:48 AM
yes I do...it was...
The “transcript” was only provided after the House committee requested it.
We would have nothing if it were up to Tulsi, as she doesn’t believe anything needs an inquiry or investigation.
The “transcript” is nowhere near the complete conversation. If you believe the information brought forward by the whistleblower is second hand, the “transcript” is too. It’s a summarized, modified version of the original dialog, carefully calibrated so it’s negative impact on the public is reduced to a minimum.
Next up, House committees will ask for, or if necessary subpoena the source material. That’s what Hirono, Schatz, and Case would like to see.
Tulsi? Once again she’s asking for nothing, and that’s all we’d get if it were up to her.
The “transcript” was only provided after the House committee requested it.
We would have nothing if it were up to Tulsi, as she doesn’t believe anything needs an inquiry or investigation.
The “transcript” is nowhere near the complete conversation. If you believe the information brought forward by the whistleblower is second hand, the “transcript” is too. It’s a summarized, modified version of the original dialog, carefully calibrated so it’s negative impact on the public is reduced to a minimum.
Next up, House committees will ask for, or if necessary subpoena the source material. That’s what Hirono, Schatz, and Case would like to see.
Tulsi? Once again she’s asking for nothing, and that’s all we’d get if it were up to her.
"I'm at that stage in life where I stay out of discussions. Even if you say 1+1=5, you're right - have fun." - Keanu Reeves