01-31-2020, 03:54 PM
I was just trying to answer your question of how close to his wheelhouse of expertise does this paper fall - the answer is very. Not that his credentials make him right, but when many unaffiliated scientists are reaching the same conclusion, it makes that paper out of India seem less reliable, no?
If you don't mind me asking, how do you choose which sources to trust? It seems you don't have the background to sort through the scientific data for yourself, so how do you pick between the CDC, CCP, WHO, CNN, FOX, FB, PW, etc... ("keeps 'em guessing like some kind of parlor game, prevents 'em from asking the most important question: why?" - Donald Sutherland in JFK, again)
For clarity I am sincerely interested in how others here approach this problem. The more I look at this the more it seems that the information wars (dare I say InfoWars
are actually more important and consequential than the biological outbreak.
If you don't mind me asking, how do you choose which sources to trust? It seems you don't have the background to sort through the scientific data for yourself, so how do you pick between the CDC, CCP, WHO, CNN, FOX, FB, PW, etc... ("keeps 'em guessing like some kind of parlor game, prevents 'em from asking the most important question: why?" - Donald Sutherland in JFK, again)
For clarity I am sincerely interested in how others here approach this problem. The more I look at this the more it seems that the information wars (dare I say InfoWars
are actually more important and consequential than the biological outbreak.