02-02-2020, 06:38 PM
rainyjim - My point here being that the enormous number of matches is not surprising at all when blasting a short sequence.
Well that's really one of the major problems with the paper. The short sequences match hundreds or thousands of organisms. There is no reason to choose HIV (much less three different HIV strains) out of all the possible choices as the match. It's like saying the latest Stephen King novel took material from the Bible because it contains the word "the". What evidence do you actually see that nCov was engineered?
Another huge takeaway from Dr. Cottrell’s little talk is that the (Indian) paper focused on only four of the insertions - but there were many more.
Yeah, you might want to spend a little more time evaluating this source. When he talks about how he knew from the beginning it was engineered and how he's more up to date than Dave Hodges Common Sense and Alex Jones Infowars, the shows he watches to keep up with New World Order stuff, it gves me pause. Unless of course these views are part of your mindset so it's supportive evidence for you?
https://youtu.be/xEzTHfEgr_w?t=47
islandlvng - Although with this hiv discussion, Merck, gilead sciences and Glaxo smith kline might be worth watching for a bump or two.
Given it's lopinavir, ritonavir, and oseltamivir being discussed maybe check Abbott, Abbvie, and whoever is making Tamiflu these days (Genentech/Rosche?)
PS It looks like Ascletis is Chinese for Abbott
https://yicaiglobal.com/news/ascletis-ph...recoveries
Well that's really one of the major problems with the paper. The short sequences match hundreds or thousands of organisms. There is no reason to choose HIV (much less three different HIV strains) out of all the possible choices as the match. It's like saying the latest Stephen King novel took material from the Bible because it contains the word "the". What evidence do you actually see that nCov was engineered?
Another huge takeaway from Dr. Cottrell’s little talk is that the (Indian) paper focused on only four of the insertions - but there were many more.
Yeah, you might want to spend a little more time evaluating this source. When he talks about how he knew from the beginning it was engineered and how he's more up to date than Dave Hodges Common Sense and Alex Jones Infowars, the shows he watches to keep up with New World Order stuff, it gves me pause. Unless of course these views are part of your mindset so it's supportive evidence for you?
https://youtu.be/xEzTHfEgr_w?t=47
islandlvng - Although with this hiv discussion, Merck, gilead sciences and Glaxo smith kline might be worth watching for a bump or two.
Given it's lopinavir, ritonavir, and oseltamivir being discussed maybe check Abbott, Abbvie, and whoever is making Tamiflu these days (Genentech/Rosche?)
PS It looks like Ascletis is Chinese for Abbott
https://yicaiglobal.com/news/ascletis-ph...recoveries