08-06-2021, 07:27 PM
For the sake of clarity - from a sample size of 44,000 of whom 13,000 were aged 18-49 of whom medical histories were available for only 3700, of whom 513 were not pregnant, smokers, or healthcare workers, of whom 74% were male.
As I stated previously this analysis is woefully inadequate. It ignores the other 31,000 outside of their preferred age range. It ignores 9,000 patients who did not have recorded medical histories. It then only considers a limited list of preexisiting conditions to arrive at a final number of 513 and somehow 74% of those being male is meant to be an important statistic?
Back to my previous inquiry - what were the underlying or preexisting conditions of the deceased covid patients in Hawaii?
As I stated previously this analysis is woefully inadequate. It ignores the other 31,000 outside of their preferred age range. It ignores 9,000 patients who did not have recorded medical histories. It then only considers a limited list of preexisiting conditions to arrive at a final number of 513 and somehow 74% of those being male is meant to be an important statistic?
Back to my previous inquiry - what were the underlying or preexisting conditions of the deceased covid patients in Hawaii?