(11-13-2021, 12:13 AM)Obie Wrote: Since you have a problem finding the transcripts here is the final Disposition.
They both entered a plea of no contest and were given a deferred sentence and put on probation until 09/21/2021 which has now been completed.
PM HRS 711-1101(1)(b)
Disorderly conduct noise
Vio Dt: 11/29/2020
Citation/Arrest #: C20-04923
Plea: No Contest 04/20/2021
Disposition: Accept Nolo Contendere Plea 04/20/2021
Sentence: DANCP (Deferred Acceptance of Nolo Contendere) for 6 Month(s) subject to mandatory terms and conditions 04/20/2021
The following special conditions apply :
1)You shall sign a Waiver of Extradition.
2)You shall submit to photographing by the Adult Client Probation Services for identification purposes.
3)Hearing on proof of compliance/DANCP 9-21-21 at 8 am in courtroom 2
Referred to Collections 04/20/2021
$500.00 Fine/Monetary Assessment 04/20/2021
$30.00 Crime Victim Fee 04/20/2021
$75.00 Probation Fee 04/20/2021
Like I said. I found that fine, but disorderly conduct isn't the same as reckless endangerment. There's something missing.
Either a plea deal or they just couldn't get reckless endangerment to stick so they were grasping for anything to charge them with. If they had only a public defender it's silly to think they had the best representation.
I'm looking for more detailed info. I thought they recorded more than just that in a transcript. I could be wrong though.
One thing I do know though is that courts don't just record the wrong charge, for some reason reckless endangerment got dropped. That's the only explanation.