11-17-2021, 02:42 PM
(11-17-2021, 08:03 AM)eightfingers2.0 Wrote: Money may have a requirement to be spent on “infrastructure”, the definition of which seems pretty fluid right now. I doubt that “fluidly” would go all the way to any sort of tax relief.
Hmmm. Then maybe fluid taxpayers could identify as infrastructure and be entitled to some of that money?
Keep it local 