12-10-2021, 05:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-10-2021, 06:19 PM by HereOnThePrimalEdge.)
Wow, I'm a little disappointed...i
Several pages ago: you told me to assume the best - - had you taken your own advice most of this thread would not exist. You assumed the worst of several members of Punaweb.
without proof: all of pog, airport parking, RWR posts have had his name(s) removed since he was banned and those names are replaced with “guest”. Had I spent an inordinate amount of time finding some of his worst comments, the poster is listed as “guest”. You would not consider that proof, because “guest” could be anyone, so what’s the point? You have multiple long time members of Punaweb stating they recognize ‘elepaio’s distinctive writing style as identical to pog, airportparking, & RWR, but you choose to believe ‘elepaio at face value.
One of ‘elepaio’s tactics is to flatter & compliment other members of Punaweb in an over-the-top manner, to gain allies for his attacks if and when they come. You don’t have to believe that. But you might want to watch for the possibility as he has you doing exactly that, taking his side and defending him. You might say you’re defending him from attack. Fair enough. That’s how his game starts.
I’ll be glad to answer your questions, but there’s no point if the written proof isn’t absolutely definitive, right? Even if a Rob himself would say pog, airportparking, RWR have been banned, that’s not definitive proof ‘elepaio is one and the same as those posters. That’s how he manages to return again & again & again...
Several pages ago: you told me to assume the best - - had you taken your own advice most of this thread would not exist. You assumed the worst of several members of Punaweb.
without proof: all of pog, airport parking, RWR posts have had his name(s) removed since he was banned and those names are replaced with “guest”. Had I spent an inordinate amount of time finding some of his worst comments, the poster is listed as “guest”. You would not consider that proof, because “guest” could be anyone, so what’s the point? You have multiple long time members of Punaweb stating they recognize ‘elepaio’s distinctive writing style as identical to pog, airportparking, & RWR, but you choose to believe ‘elepaio at face value.
One of ‘elepaio’s tactics is to flatter & compliment other members of Punaweb in an over-the-top manner, to gain allies for his attacks if and when they come. You don’t have to believe that. But you might want to watch for the possibility as he has you doing exactly that, taking his side and defending him. You might say you’re defending him from attack. Fair enough. That’s how his game starts.
I’ll be glad to answer your questions, but there’s no point if the written proof isn’t absolutely definitive, right? Even if a Rob himself would say pog, airportparking, RWR have been banned, that’s not definitive proof ‘elepaio is one and the same as those posters. That’s how he manages to return again & again & again...