What does those specific questions matter? You and I know the issue is that people lost their jobs, school children couldn’t play sports, etc… coercive policy is 90% of the way to force, especially if the data provided was false and did not spell out the full picture of risks and efficacy. the studies show the rest of the lockdown policies did not help, they hurt. How are we to learn from our past mistakes and current ongoing policy if we can’t analyze the real data?
I ask again, may I post the studies from John’s hopkins, lancet, Tel Aviv university and analysis of Oxford data by Bloomberg, that directly addresses the issue of lockdown policy of which we are still dealing with in Hawaii? I’m happy to drop it, but I think it’s only fair that the actual data and science be shared after 20 pages of petty bickering and conjecture. I certainly did not mean to cross a line of allowable discourse, the precedent was set and I thought the actual studies and data might actually be helpful.
Honestly it seems unfair as well that ironyak is allowed to make false accusations and arguments that I cannot respond to as well. Maybe you could reinstate my final post and then call red light. Happy to leave it alone now warned. Mahalo
I ask again, may I post the studies from John’s hopkins, lancet, Tel Aviv university and analysis of Oxford data by Bloomberg, that directly addresses the issue of lockdown policy of which we are still dealing with in Hawaii? I’m happy to drop it, but I think it’s only fair that the actual data and science be shared after 20 pages of petty bickering and conjecture. I certainly did not mean to cross a line of allowable discourse, the precedent was set and I thought the actual studies and data might actually be helpful.
Honestly it seems unfair as well that ironyak is allowed to make false accusations and arguments that I cannot respond to as well. Maybe you could reinstate my final post and then call red light. Happy to leave it alone now warned. Mahalo