(09-23-2022, 08:14 PM)HereOnThePrimalEdge Wrote: that investment would be substantially higher here than elsewhere.
But yet, the company wanted to build here.
I'm fairly sure the company wanted to build here for a very good reason; Hawaii Island is the closest place in the US to the equator, and being closer to the equator means you need to use less energy to launch a satellite due to the rotation of the Earth. That would reduce costs significantly. The other factor is you would be launching directly over the ocean which is always a good thing in case of a launch failure. As for needing a railroad or new highway, the observatories on Mauna Kea succeeded with either of those for decades and they also required brain power and existing infrastructure to work, so I don't see that as a relevant argument.
(09-24-2022, 05:13 AM)kander Wrote: But the technical hurdles to spin something up to even a few thousand mph is far beyond what is feasible.
What is your opinion based on?