11-08-2022, 06:00 PM
(11-07-2022, 08:34 PM)kander Wrote:I didn’t detect sarcasm in your post either. If you’re finding it difficult to master, perhaps take a lesson from randomq.(11-07-2022, 08:24 AM)TomK Wrote:Seems you find sarcasm a difficult subject to master.(11-06-2022, 04:16 PM)kander Wrote: Considering how tainted the science has been over the past couple years, I dont see any harm in promoting his paper. At least nobody will die from it. And its quite well written. So its certainly convincing from that standpoint.
I didnt see the part in it where Hawaiians were navigating interstellar space in it though. That part must have not been included outside this forum.
For crying out loud, read his original post:
https://punaweb.org/forum/showthread.php?tid=22864
The paper he or she claims to have written has nothing to do with Hawaiian wayfinding but whines about it anyway. And he doesn't say Hawaiians navigated interstellar space, he claims that Hawaiians invented a way to navigate it. Please get your facts right.
Finally, if it's well-written it must be OK? What kind of logic is that? I could write a well-written sentence and claim something that's entirely untrue, but in your eyes that is convincing?