09-10-2023, 12:57 AM
They'd have to add a clause that fire is covered only when there is not lava or a fire caused by lava nearby, since that was a point of contention in 2018.
But yeah, you'd think eruptions/lava could be a separate rider. Maybe some state law or precedent standing in the way.
But yeah, you'd think eruptions/lava could be a separate rider. Maybe some state law or precedent standing in the way.