05-15-2024, 09:57 PM
A beer making term?
You're funny Edge. Not as cute as Tom's newest pet but you did serve in your day..
From.. https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/warts-and-all.html
‘Warts and all’ means the whole thing; not concealing the less attractive parts.
This phrase ‘warts and all’ is said to derive from Oliver Cromwell’s instructions to the painter Sir Peter Lely, when commissioning a painting.
At the time of the alleged instruction, Cromwell was Lord Protector of England. Lely had been portrait artist to Charles I and, following the restoration of the monarchy in 1660, he was appointed as Charles II’s Principal Painter in Ordinary.
Lely’s painting style was, as was usual at the time, intended to flatter the sitter. Royalty in particular expected portraits to show them in the best possible light, if not to be outright fanciful. Lely’s painting of Charles II shows what was expected of a painting of a head of state in the 17th century. It emphasizes the shapely royal calves – a prized fashion feature at that time.
Cromwell did have a preference for being portrayed as a gentleman of military bearing, but was well-known as being opposed to all forms of personal vanity. This ‘puritan Roundhead’ versus ‘dashing Cavalier’ shorthand is often used to denote the differences in style of the two opposing camps in the English Commonwealth and subsequent Restoration. It is entirely plausible that he would have issued a ‘warts and all’ instruction when being painted and it is unlikely that Lely would have modified his style and produced the ‘warts and all’ portrait of Cromwell unless someone told him to.
---
And hey, don't you think Tom has some pretty impressive worts?
You're funny Edge. Not as cute as Tom's newest pet but you did serve in your day..
From.. https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/warts-and-all.html
‘Warts and all’ means the whole thing; not concealing the less attractive parts.
This phrase ‘warts and all’ is said to derive from Oliver Cromwell’s instructions to the painter Sir Peter Lely, when commissioning a painting.
At the time of the alleged instruction, Cromwell was Lord Protector of England. Lely had been portrait artist to Charles I and, following the restoration of the monarchy in 1660, he was appointed as Charles II’s Principal Painter in Ordinary.
Lely’s painting style was, as was usual at the time, intended to flatter the sitter. Royalty in particular expected portraits to show them in the best possible light, if not to be outright fanciful. Lely’s painting of Charles II shows what was expected of a painting of a head of state in the 17th century. It emphasizes the shapely royal calves – a prized fashion feature at that time.
Cromwell did have a preference for being portrayed as a gentleman of military bearing, but was well-known as being opposed to all forms of personal vanity. This ‘puritan Roundhead’ versus ‘dashing Cavalier’ shorthand is often used to denote the differences in style of the two opposing camps in the English Commonwealth and subsequent Restoration. It is entirely plausible that he would have issued a ‘warts and all’ instruction when being painted and it is unlikely that Lely would have modified his style and produced the ‘warts and all’ portrait of Cromwell unless someone told him to.
---
And hey, don't you think Tom has some pretty impressive worts?