Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MK controversy thread
(06-16-2024, 05:07 PM)HereOnThePrimalEdge Wrote:  I am holding you to the same requirements you expect of others.

You may wish to consider, is this really an apples to apples comparison?  Tom, in general, asks for scientific research, or information published by reputable sources.  You are asking Tom to read through conversations and interactions with and from a loved one that he lost.  You’re asking him to re-experience and then repeat some of the worst comments and related attacks made about someone he cared for deeply.  Pam was a ray of light on this forum, she always brought something positive to the conversation.  Which is more than can be said of the offender we’re discussing.

I’d say in this case we might simply consider the source.  And his multiple personalities.

Sorry HOTPE,

TomK brought it up and even when others stated that they recalled reading certain posts, TomK wanted the evidence. I agree whole heartedly with your comments about Pam.
Wahine

Lead by example
Reply


Messages In This Thread
MK controversy thread - by TomK - 12-21-2023, 07:36 AM
RE: Mauna Kea/Maunakea controversy thread - by Wao nahele wahine - 06-16-2024, 05:27 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)