This is just a quick response since I'm not following the thread closely. I see arguments being made that have been debunked many times elsewhere, so I take little notice of them. I'm not entirely sure why nuclear power was introduced here, but I agree it's a way of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and is safe if in the right hands, i.e., not Russia or North Korea. There's always the issue of what to do with radioactive waste, but I see the human influence on the Earth's atmosphere as a much more urgent problem we must solve. I don't understand why some can't accept this and disregard the evidence.
If, on the other hand, the nuclear power stuff was brought up because I mentioned nuclear bombs, I reasoned that a few large nuclear explosions in NEO would disrupt pretty much all the world's electronics. We'd be back to the middle ages very quickly.
If, on the other hand, the nuclear power stuff was brought up because I mentioned nuclear bombs, I reasoned that a few large nuclear explosions in NEO would disrupt pretty much all the world's electronics. We'd be back to the middle ages very quickly.