08-12-2024, 08:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-12-2024, 09:52 AM by Wao nahele kane.)
MyManao,
Lots of people do use chat gtp/AI to form posts online. Regardless of the forum, some people will copy a post from someone and paste it in a chat AI box and the AI will reply and they'll copy the AI reply and use it to form their reply to the post from that orginal someone.
Beyond the arrogant nonsense described by one TK, thinking a chat programing endeavor is somehow neccesary instead of simply copy and paste routines between a chat AI and a web forum. But using chat AIs have been used to write scientific papers as well. In fact, it's becoming a serious problem across many venues. But yes, some people do use them for forming daily posts on forums such as this one.
If you think that theory is not used as the de-facto framework for scientific grant requests, you're an idiot and need your ass waxed academically right here and now.
Theory is an explanation of observations forged in evidence and permeates the entire framework of all science in general.
When an addlepated sphincter like yourself requires evidence for someone's "wonder", it says your brain is confusing wonder with something that requires evidence, such as a theory or a statement of proposed fact. Grant requests were cited because you act as if you're editing or reading someone's grant request that's in need of some evidence. You're just another person using a web forum here. You're not a professor here and we aren't your students and we owe you nothing with respect to evidence or anything else. You don't hold a crown that we must all bow to, and frankly, your mind is on its way out the door.
Your disjointed speculations are really tiring to keep up with and I'm not interested in trying to de-scramble your countless nonsensical statements.
In-fact, consider this your heads up. I will be ignoring your posts from here on out, because I think you've aquired a brain dissorder of some sort and it's entirely too taxing to explain everything as if I'm conversing with a child.
Lots of people do use chat gtp/AI to form posts online. Regardless of the forum, some people will copy a post from someone and paste it in a chat AI box and the AI will reply and they'll copy the AI reply and use it to form their reply to the post from that orginal someone.
Beyond the arrogant nonsense described by one TK, thinking a chat programing endeavor is somehow neccesary instead of simply copy and paste routines between a chat AI and a web forum. But using chat AIs have been used to write scientific papers as well. In fact, it's becoming a serious problem across many venues. But yes, some people do use them for forming daily posts on forums such as this one.
(08-12-2024, 07:49 AM)TomK Wrote:Us must be you and the rock in your pocket. The only one mistaken is yourself. If you can somehow construe that as a explanation of a theory, your brain is clearly rotted.(08-12-2024, 07:41 AM)Wao nahele kane Wrote:(08-12-2024, 07:20 AM)TomK Wrote:I shared no opinion on what a theory is, wolly plonker. BUT if you think a theoretical explanation avoids evidence, you're also a Muppet.(08-12-2024, 06:56 AM)Wao nahele kane Wrote: TomK,
Your opinion? Like MyManaos opinion? Damn, you're as daft as a brush.
I want evidence that it's your opinion and not some AI bollocks.
...Umkay... umkay?
I asked a question, and it wasn't answered. Instead, it generated a post that said nothing at all. If you think I'm an AI bot, then post the evidence. It's your burden, and not mine to show otherwise. Then, there's your opinion on what a theory is. I can tell you it's not defined the way you seem to think it is. Frankly, you're just playing at being a silly bugger.
Now, provide the evidence that you're not an AI. That's what I want to see, right now!
Your words: "You're mistaking speculation for something like a theory that provides evidence within a grant request."
You just told us what you think a theory is. You are very mistaken.
If you think that theory is not used as the de-facto framework for scientific grant requests, you're an idiot and need your ass waxed academically right here and now.
Theory is an explanation of observations forged in evidence and permeates the entire framework of all science in general.
When an addlepated sphincter like yourself requires evidence for someone's "wonder", it says your brain is confusing wonder with something that requires evidence, such as a theory or a statement of proposed fact. Grant requests were cited because you act as if you're editing or reading someone's grant request that's in need of some evidence. You're just another person using a web forum here. You're not a professor here and we aren't your students and we owe you nothing with respect to evidence or anything else. You don't hold a crown that we must all bow to, and frankly, your mind is on its way out the door.
Your disjointed speculations are really tiring to keep up with and I'm not interested in trying to de-scramble your countless nonsensical statements.
In-fact, consider this your heads up. I will be ignoring your posts from here on out, because I think you've aquired a brain dissorder of some sort and it's entirely too taxing to explain everything as if I'm conversing with a child.