(10-15-2024, 04:07 AM)Obie Wrote: Again all of that gibberish is Patricia's opinion.-----------
All associations are allowed to change their bylaws as long as they are consistent with the laws. HPPOA bylaws have been reviewed by lawyers and approved by the membership.
The judicial rulings that Patricia has jumbled together to form her opinion were issued about the matters before the court. They were issued to get these associations headed in the right direction but they are not binding laws.
Aloha.
Why do you say the judicial rulings were not binding? I have seen and know of court documents that state the rulings are binding.
Also, I do not understand, please tell me how a court can require that people must join and fund a voluntary club if they do not wish to do so? (And no, I am not referring to road fees). Again, there is free association.
Attorneys over the years, accountants, even "members," had/have no understanding of the history. Many adhere to the false belief that HPPOA is a mandatory association and have no knowledge of how it was formed, why it was formed, or by whom it was formed.
Acronyms have been mistakenly and intentionally misused in replacement of one another to create confusion,- HPP, HPPC, HPPOA.
And terminology has been swapped out (members for owners and vice versa) which also blurs meaning.
I am just the messenger, Mr. O. I know you do not like me. But I did not make the history. If you have documents, etc., that can shed more light on this subject I would be very happy to see them- truly.